A Toronto Law Firm, McCague Peacock Borlack McInnis & Lloyd LLP
 
  • McCague Peacock Borlack McInnis & Lloyd LLP
  •  
  • Suite 2700, P.O. Box 136
  • The Exchange Tower
  • 130 King Street West
  • Toronto, Ontario
  • Canada, M5X 1C7
  •  
  • Telephone:
    416-860-0001
  • Facsimile:
    416-860-0003
  • Email:
    mwpb@mwpb.com

A Toronto Law Firm
McCAGUE PEACOCK BORLACK
McINNIS & LLOYD LLP

We are a Toronto law firm in the heart of the Bay Street business community, dedicated to all types of litigation and advocacy. While we have a strong focus on insurance defence work and insurance coverage litigation, our lawyers represent a variety of corporate and commercial entities, banks and financial companies, and individuals across Canada. Our lawyers regularly represent clients at trials, on appeals, and in alternative dispute resolution processes (ADR) by way of arbitration, mediation, and negotiation. We assist our clients by selecting the right strategy to resolve their legal problems. Our goal is to obtain the best result in the shortest time for the least expense.

We are one of Toronto's leading litigation law firms, and we pride ourselves on being the largest insurance boutique law firm in Canada. While much of our work focuses on litigation (both plaintiff and defence work), our law firm has a wide range of practice areas and diverse skills. We often draw on ADR methods for early resolution of legal disputes, and our lawyers have extensive experience before all levels of court, from trial to appeal. If you have a legal problem, our lawyers can help.

News and Events


The Court of Appeal for Ontario has released an important decision in Joseph v. Paramount Canada's Wonderland, determining that the common law discretion to extend limitation periods via the doctrine of special circumstances has been eliminated by the Limitations Act, 2002. Please contact Anthony Cole for details.

Hillel David. and Lisa La Horey were successful in the Supreme Court of Canada in the well-known "fly in the bottle" case, Mustapha v. Culligan. The Supreme Court sided with the defendant, holding that the plaintiff should not have been awarded $341,000 at trial for psychiatric injuries he sustained when he saw a dead fly in his unopened bottle of water, because the plaintiff's reaction to the relatively trivial incident was exaggerated and not reasonably foreseeable. To read the decision, click here.